‘(Indo-Pak) trade can meet the aspirations of young people. Any hostile act sets the pace of engagement back’
- Purnia rally: Modi takes a dig at Nitish, says his PM dream was reason for break up of alliance
- Still no sign of Malaysia Airlines jet lost in "unprecedented mystery"
- DMK denies ticket to Alagiri; Raja, Maran get renomination
- Coal scam: SC directs CBI to file five charge sheets by Mar 28
- Haryana, Gujarat top industry-friendly states, Maharashtra among bottom five
In this Idea Exchange, Anand Sharma, Minister of Commerce and Industry, speaks about FDI in retail, retrospective taxation and the party's Chintan Shivir in Jaipur. The session was moderated by Deputy Editor Subhomoy Bhattacharjee
Subhomoy Bhattacharjee: Murli Manohar Joshi has said if the BJP comes to power, it will think about rolling back FDI in multi-brand retail. There is a sense of uncertainty. Do investors reflect such concerns?
Anand Sharma: Such statements are irresponsible. In a democracy, political parties can take positions. I have explained in great detail that when the BJP-led NDA government was in office, they were planning to open up FDI in multi-brand retail. But they never had any stakeholder consultations. While for our policy, we consulted all the stakeholders, all the state governments, the farmers' unions, the consumer unions, community organisations, industry association, and small and medium enterprises (SMEs). After that, the committee of secretaries met, the recommendations were considered. So the deliberations went on for over a year. It was a democratic exercise, transparent and inclusive. Now the BJP did a U-turn purely because of partisan politics. If farmers are in favour of it, consumer organisations are in favour, then whose case is the BJP pleading? Moreover, we left the decision to states. So it's for the states to decide. It is undemocratic to deny those states who have been in favour of it. The states who are not in favour can rethink and apply later. The licence is given by states. I can understand the concerns of the Left parties because they have ideological blinkers and I can't change that. Yet, when they go to China, they will shop from multi-brand retail stores. The BJP has an opportunistic agenda. Such statements do a great disservice to the country, particularly at a time when our economy is under stress and there is a slowdown. The trade deficit and current account deficit are worrisome. For financing these, there are only three ways—FDI, FII and External Commercial Borrowings. First option is FDI. So if we are taking steps which will restore the confidence of our global partners, should that be negated? The BJP owes an explanation to the country on why they have done a U-turn. This is double standards and hypocrisy. The elected government has the discretion to take an executive decision and this has been dragged to parliamentary debate which has never happened in the history of the country. And now, after having lost the vote, they are still talking about it.
- Bengal model better than Modi’s Gujarat, says Didi
- Sindhis threaten to move HC if Sindhu Sagar not cleaned
- Three RTI activists whom Kejriwal paid homage are alive
- Poojary wins Mangalore primary
- Short change: Health cover for girl child at 50% discount
- Run with the bulls, don’t lose out to foreign investors again
- AAP workers stage protest outside Kejriwal’s residence over ticket distribution
- BJP boycotts NDTV over news gaffe | The Indian Express
- Out of the promised 50,000 homes for the poor, not even 50 constructed in Gujarat by BJP: Kejriwal
- BJP complains to EC against Rahul over RSS remarks, seeks derecognition of Congress