‘Missing’ letter halts Mulayam’s lion safari

SP president Mulayam Singh Yadav's dream project to have a lion safari in his native district of Etawah has once again run into trouble, this time due to a "missing" letter at the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF).

The letter dated July 19 was reportedly sent by Rupak Dey, UP's Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, to the ministry in reply to its objections, raised in a letter on July 1, that the state government was going ahead with the project illegally as no permission under the Forest Conservation Act had been taken for using forest land for the purpose of the proposed lion safari.

After this, the state Forest Department stopped work at the site. On August 13, Rupak Dey wrote to MoEF, stating that the ministry can depute its officers for site inspection in the light of his earlier letter dated July 19.

However, officials at MoEF could not locate any letter from Dey dated July 19. They wrote to Dey, apprising him that his letter of July 19 was not available with them and hence a copy should be sent.

Since then, there has been no response from the Forest Department while the work on the proposed lion safari is at a standstill.

Asked about the missing letter, Dey said, "It is a matter between my office and the ministry. There is nothing much in that letter, it is a routine communication with the MoEF. We have asked them for a site inspection."

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus