2G probe: PAC members raise questions on CBI's credibility
- Delhi: Multi-vehicle pileup on NH-1 leaves at least five dead
- Siachen avalanche: Air pocket under 35 ft of snow kept Lance Naik Hanumanthappa alive
- Facts dispute claims by banks: write-off gallops, recovery crawls
- Upset allies Akali Dal and Shiv Sena let BJP know: Keep us in loop
- David Headley deposition adjourned for the day following technical glitch
Against the backdrop of a CBI prosecutor in 2G case allegedly being caught on tape sharing legal strategy with an accused, members of a Parliamentary panel on Wednesday raised questions on the credibility of the investigation agency and its probe in the case.
Some members of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), including its Chairman Murli Manohar Joshi today raked the issue of the alleged taped conversation between CBI prosecutor A K Singh and accused Sanjay Chandra, Managing Director of Unitech, when CBI Director Ranjit Sinha appeared before the panel.
The members are learnt to have said such incidents create doubts over the credibility of the 2G probe in particular and that of the agency in general.
Though 2G issue is not on the agenda of the PAC today, members raised the matter before Sinha. The controversial PAC draft report on 2G is still pending as Congress members had opposed it and it could not be tabled in Parliament.
Sinha is learnt to have said CBI has taken action by removing the prosecutor from the case based on prima facie facts.
CBI officials had appeared before the panel to give an update of its investigations into the Commonwealth Games scam and the coal block allocation case.
In reply to posers by members on how the agency plans to strengthen its investigation skills, the CBI chief is understood to have said the organisation has moved proposals to the government for modernisation.
Some members suggested that the CBI should emerge as an "independent" organisation to ensure a fair investigation.
The PAC also asked the agency to provide details of cases where it has filed closure report either at the preliminary inquiry level or in courts.
The agency was also asked to explain the methodology used in quantifying losses in cases it is investigating.