2G tapes: My privacy violated, Tata tells SC
- Mad rush, chaos as Arvind Kejriwal takes local train to woo 'aam aadmi' in Mumbai
- SC defers hearing on Sahara's plea on releasing Subrata Roy
- IAF aircraft on standby for missing Malaysian Airlines search ops
- Presidential delay in mercy petitions: SC won't reconsider verdict
- Lalu loyalist-turned rebel Ram Kripal Yadav joins BJP
Tata Group chairman Ratan Tata moved the Supreme Court on Monday seeking action against persons responsible for the leakage and "unauthorised" publication of tapes of his conversation with corporate lobbyist Nira Radia, alleging that it was sheer violation of his right to privacy.
The gist of Tata's petition moved under Article 32 of the Constitution records the arguments made by him to The Indian Express Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta for Walk The Talk programme on NDTV 24x7, Tata's lawyer in the Supreme Court, Manik Karanjawala, confirmed.
Tata argues that the tapes, recorded under IT surveillance of Radia in 2008 and 2009, should be used for the "public purpose" of the investigation.
Ratan Tata approached the Supreme Court seeking action against those involved in the leakage of tapes containing his conversation with Radia.
Tata, in the petition, has contended that the leakage of the tapes have infringed upon his fundamental Right to Life, which includes right to privacy.
Tata has made the central government a party in his petition. Union Home Secretary, the CBI, the Income Tax Department, the Department of Telecommunication and the Department of Information Technology have been made respondents.
Meanwhile, sources said that senior Advocate Harish Salve will appear for Tata in the apex court.
Tata in his petition submitted that the conversation was recorded by the government and "we have no quarrel with the government".
He further contended that the government owns the responsibility of maintaining privacy of a citizen.
Some of the conversation between Tata and Radia, whose public relations firms were engaged by the group, relate to personal details that could no way be part of investigation, Tata argued in the petition.
Tata has sought a direction for fixing the responsibility for the alleged leakage of the tapes.
In his interview to Shekhar Gupta, he had said that government agencies should show a "sense of responsibility" to use the "special right to be able to invade people's privacy for national security or for enforcement of law, whatever it may be" for prosecution purposes alone.