6 in-laws absolved of charge of causing woman's miscarriage
- Porn ban: Govt lifts ban on websites sans child pornography
- Mumbai attacks: Five explosive revelations made by Tariq Khosa
- Parliamentary panel on land bill postpones meet following suspension of Congress MP
- Combative Opposition stalls Parliament proceedings
- Missing Pawan Hans chopper sighted, rescue operation to resume tomorrow
Six members of a family have been acquitted by a Delhi court of the charge of allegedly causing the miscarriage of a pregnant woman and harassing her for dowry saying it was not proved that the victim was treated cruelly.
The court absolved the six family members, including two women, saying the police failed to prove beyond reasonable suspicion that the complainant was meted out cruelty for dowry.
Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) T R Naval also said the police had been unable to prove that the accused caused any "grave injury or danger to the life or mental or physical health of the woman (complainant)."
The court let off the woman's husband Khemanand, her parents-in-law Dev Dutt and Bhagwati Devi, brother-in-laws Tara Chand and Kamal Kishore and sister-in-law Nirmala Devi of the charge of harassing her for dowry and causing her miscarriage.
It also acquitted Mandawali resident Khemanand of the charges of criminal breach of trust.
According to the prosecution, the woman, who had married Khemanand in December 2001, was allegedly mis-treated by her in-laws and they had demanded Rs two lakh from her to start the business of her husband. When she expressed inability to give the amount, the six accused beat her up, it said.
The woman, who is living with her minor daughter at her parental house, said the accused had demanded money and she was beaten and thrown out of her matrimonial house when she was unable to meet their demands.
She alleged that when she conceived for the second time, her husband and the other accused abused and kicked her in the womb several times leading to her miscarriage. The six accused, however, had argued the woman was suffering from "ectopic pregnancy" leading to her miscarriage and they cannot be held liable for this.