A dismal debate
- Vote for Supriya Sule or lose water, âthreatensâ Ajit Pawar
- Nobel laureate Gabriel Garcia Marquez dies at 87
- 5th phase of elections: Moderate to high turnout on biggest voting day
- Dhowan takes over as Navy Chief, superseded Sinha resigns
- Election Commission lifts ban on BJP leader Amit Shah after he promises to behave
Two things depressed me about last week's debate in the Lok Sabha and neither had anything to do with FDI. The first was the sight of the political princelings and princesses who now appear to constitute the bulk of our younger MPs. On a discreet backbench sat Rahul Gandhi chatting to Milind Deora and Jyotiraditya Scindia. In another corner I spotted the heirs of Sharad Pawar, Chandrashekhar and Chaudhury Charan Singh in a huddle and, unless Doordarshan was making a sly subversive point, its cameras made it seem as if there was not a single row in which a princess or princeling was not seated.
If proof were needed that hereditary democracy is a bad idea, it came in the inanity of some interventions. As I listened to Mrs Sukhbir Badal, I found myself mentally giving her first prize for worst speech. She sounded as if she were reading a school essay written for her by the head girl. Then, when some Punjabi MPs interrupted to create domestic discord by revealing that while she was opposing FDI, her husband had openly supported it, she became so shrill that I had to mute my television set. In the moment of silence that followed, I became quite nostalgic about the old days when I used to cover the Lok Sabha and the only prince in it was Rajiv Gandhi.
The second thing that depressed me about the FDI debate was the startling discovery that everyone in the Bharatiya Janata Party seems now to have become a dedicated communist. As I listened to speaker after speaker rave on about how India would be destroyed by FDI in the retail trade, I found myself wondering how us hacks had once described the BJP as the 'right wing, Hindu, nationalist' party. Is there nobody in our main Opposition party who has been paying attention to how economic history changed all over the world in the past two decades? Nobody who has noticed that the East India Company existed in a very different time and a very different world?
- As EC website crashes due to overload, party workers use apps to locate voters
- An entire society in Kothrud could not vote
- Chaos, anger across city over missing names
- Mulayam pushes third front, says will stake claim to PM post
- Don’t look at my candidates, votes for me: Maya to Dalits
- AAP biggies focus on Vishwas, Kejri seats, other units suffer