All parties willing, but Land Acquisition Bill makes no headway in meet

Land Acquisition BillNot acquisition, land should be leased, with farmer remaining the owner and earning regular income, BJP suggested. (AP)

An all-party meeting to iron out differences on the contentious Land Acquisition Bill today failed to make much headway amid divergent views, though the parties did express willingness to get the measure passed in Parliament at the earliest.

It was decided to hold a fresh round of consultations on April 18 to sort out differences.

"There were two options. One was to send the bill to the Standing Committee. The other was to settle the issues in all-party meeting.... We will hold a day-long meeting on April 18 where government will bring its official amendments after studying the amendments suggested by various parties," Leader of the Opposition Sushma Swaraj said after the meeting.

Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh was hopeful that the bill will be passed in the Budget session.

"There is a little progress. I hope that the bill will be passed in this session," he said.

Swaraj said the BJP today submitted 12 points of concern. She said the government has deleted the term SEZ and replaced it with 'manufacturing zones' in the bill. "It is the same thing...," she said.

BJP suggested that instead of acquisition, the land could be leased to the developer as it was a "better proposition" because the land will remain with the farmer and would provide him with regular annual income.

"If the land is not utilised for the purpose for which it was leased, it could be returned to the farmer," Swaraj said.

She said another issue to which BJP objected was the "very wide" definition of the term 'public purpose'.

In reply to a poser, Swaraj said she was "hopeful" that the bill will be passed soon.

During the meeting, Samajwadi Party's Rewati Raman Singh objected to the poor rate of compensation and suggested jobs for young members of the farmers' families which give out their land.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus