American Idol judges play nice after feud
- India's future cannot exist without the future of Kashmir: Rajnath Singh
- Will appoint nodal officer to help Kashmiri youth across the country: Rajnath Singh in Srinagar
- Dec 16 Delhi gangrape case: Convict attempts suicide inside Tihar Jail, rushed to hospital
- Earthquake in Italy kills 247, toll may rise as rescuers continue hunt for survivors
- Rahul Gandhi twisting statement, must show generosity, apologise: RSS
New American Idol judges Mariah Carey and Nicki Minaj shrugged off their widely publicised feud as a "trumped-up thing" that was merely a passionate difference of opinion over the TV talent show's contestants. In their first big media appearance ahead of the hit show's return to Fox television on January 16, the two pop stars showered each other with praise while barely looking at each other.
A day after the airing of an ABC TV interview in which Carey said she hired extra security following threats reportedly made against her by Minaj last year, the Hero singer told reporters it was time to focus on the aspiring Idol stars. "This is a very passionate panel. There are a lot of strong personalities," said Carey, who is reportedly being paid $18 million to be an American Idol judge.
"The fighting is what it is. This is American Idol. It is bigger than some stupid trumped-up thing. It's about the next superstar... The whole thing is convoluted. It's a distraction from the show and the contestants," Carey said.
Minaj, an outspoken 30-year-old rapper, called Carey one of her 'favourite artists of all time'. "She has really shaped a generation of singers and to be on a panel with her where (contestants) all aspire to be Mariah Carey... I feel excited to see them, see someone they look up to so much," Minaj said.
- Sedition law cannot be used against honest views, expressed peacefully
- India’s dependence on China for medicine ingredients is a matter of concern
- Before Balochistan, India has supported some human rights causes and ignored others
- Olympics brought many smiles — and a little bit of rancour
- Harish Gupta case involves questions about the very nature of governmental decision-making
- Tension between the executive and judiciary could play out in creative, or destructive, ways