Apex court upholds removal of top UP power official
- Obama rules out putting US troops on ground to fight Islamic State
- Heavy rainfall floods Tamil Nadu, rail, road services badly hit; 71 killed so far
- Azam Khan's remarks on Paris attacks spark row, BJP demands action
- French officials identify Belgian national as suspected mastermind
- Awards recognition of talent, they should be cherished: Prez
Ruling that his appointment by the then Mayawati government showed absence of "intellectual objectivity" in decision making, the Supreme Court has confirmed removal of Rajesh Awasthi as the chairman of the Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Regulatory Commission (SERC).
"I conclude that there has been total non-compliance of the statutory provision by the Selection Committee which makes the decision-making process vulnerable, warranting interference by the constitutional courts and, therefore, the High Court is justified in holding that the appointment is non est (non-existent) in law," held a Bench of Justices K S Radhakrishnan and Dipak Misra.
Dismissing Awasthi's appeal against the Allahabad HC order quashing his appointment as the chairperson, the court held that his selection by the Selection Committee was "unsustainable" since legal provisions were breached while appointing him.
The main ground for quashing Awasthi's appointment was the contention that he was not eligible for selection and appointment because of "interest involved with the state government with M/s J P Power Venture of which he was vice-president".
Allowing a plea by a former energy department employee, Nand Lal Jaiswal, the HC had said the UP government might hold fresh selection with prior permission of the Election Commission in accordance with rule or on its own motion after the assembly elections result is declared.
- Responses to Mumbai, Paris attacks were strikingly different. But India has learnt since
- Tipu Sultan: Revisionist overlook his bigotry, contemporaries saw nothing else
- True successors of Gandhi-Nehru
- Raja-Mandala: The final burial of non-alignment
- Modi in Britain: Beyond a reiteration of good intentions, little was achieved
- The government’s version of the uniform civil code must be debated publicly