Apollo Tyres Ltd deal: Cooper Tire loses court rescue bid

Apollo Tyres LtdApollo Tyres Ltd, which would become the world's seventh-biggest tire maker if the deal is completed, wants to pay less than the $35 per share agreed in June. Reuters

Cooper Tire & Rubber Co's efforts to force Apollo Tyres Ltd to complete its proposed acquisition of the U.S. company for $2.3 billion received another legal setback, paving the way for the Indian company to walk away from the deal.

The Delaware Supreme Court on Monday dismissed Cooper Tire's appeal against an earlier lower court ruling that Apollo Tyres Ltd was meeting its obligations to reach new contract terms with unions at Cooper plants in Ohio and Texas.

With the latest court ruling, which came three days before it was due to be delivered, the Findlay, Ohio-based company has only a slim chance to keep Apollo Tyres Ltd from walking away from the long-pending and contentious deal.

Apollo Tyres Ltd, which would become the world's seventh-biggest tire maker if the deal is completed, wants to pay less than the $35 per share agreed in June because of demands by unions at Cooper plants and disruptions at Cooper's venture in China.

Cooper wanted the Delaware Supreme Court to overturn a ruling by a judge on the lower Court of Chancery who found last month that Apollo had not breached its obligations under the terms of the deal.

A new ruling was to be issued by Dec. 31, when the merger agreement allows Apollo to walk away.

"We are pleased by the decision of the Delaware Supreme Court today, which did more than dismiss Cooper's appeal; the court decided the appeal was improvidently granted in the first place," Apollo said in a statement on Tuesday.

"Cooper's litigation strategy to date has done nothing but generate unnecessary cost for its shareholders and for Apollo, and compound the obstacles that Cooper's situation has created for this merger," the Indian company said.

Apollo, which is seeking to cut its dependence on domestic sales through the Cooper acquisition, said it continued to believe in the merits of the merger with the U.S. company and that it was "committed to finding a sensible way forward, if possible."

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus