Ayodhya case: HC seeks clarity from apex court on observers
- Varun Gandhi hits back at cousin Priyanka over 'astray' remark, says she crossed 'lakshman rekha of decency'
- Supreme Court grants recognition to transgenders as third category of sex
- SC rejects Kejriwal's plea to stay trial in defamation case filed by Kapil Sibal's son
- Unethical, betrayal: Prime Minister Manmohan Singhâs daughter voices family anger
- Modi equates Rahul with kids, says 'toffee' has caught his fancy after 'balloon'
The Allahabad High Court has moved the Supreme Court, seeking to be heard in the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case.
Moving an application to be impleaded as a party in the bunch of appeals against the 2010 High Court verdict, the Registrar General has sought a clarification from the apex court if the observers, appointed by it for "maintenance of the transparency" of the excavation proceedings at the disputed site in Ayodhya, were still required to visit the site and file reports.
The two observers — then additional district judges — were appointed by the HC by an order in March 2003 when it ordered the Archaeological Survey of India to conduct excavation at the disputed site to confirm the third issue framed in the civil suits: "whether there was any temple/structure which was demolished and mosque was constructed on the disputed site."
The HC panel also comprised three archaeologists. It was asked to have a close vigil on the excavation work, which was carried out with the help of about 130 labourers, having an equal ratio of Muslims and Hindus. Citing Ground Penetrating Radar survey and excavations, the ASI report had indicated remnants of some pre-existing structure beneath the working floor of the demolished structure.
The HC, in a majority judgment, had in September 2010 ruled for a three-way division of the "roughly 15,000 square feet site" occupied by the mosque before its demolition on December 6, 1992 — one-third for the Sunni Waqf Board, one-third for the Nirmohi Akhara and one-third to the party for Ram Lalla.
However, admitting the bunch of appeals, the SC had in May 2011 stayed the operation of the HC verdict in the 60-year-old Ayodhya dispute and declared status quo on the title of the disputed land.
- Modi wave is a myth, says Siddaramaiah
- In Mandya, discordant notes in show of Cong unity
- ‘Fakir’ Jankar takes on Pawar might in battle against ‘dynasty’
- Ballot paper in Braille to help blind persons cast their vote
- AAP volunteer attacked
- 64-year-old fights for Punjabi language, gets little support from political parties
- BJP dancing to the tune of RSS: Sonia Gandhi | The Indian Express
- After Sanjay Baru, former coal secretary Parakh’s book embarrasses PM; ‘Singh had little political authority’
- How can Modi honour women if he can’t mention his wife, asks Rahul
- Rahul Gandhi insulting Ambedkar by taking credit for laws: Narendra Modi