Bangaru Laxman case: Court lashes out at former scribe for demanding reimbursement
- Elections 2014 LIVE: Kejriwal holds roadshow in Varanasi before filing nomination
- Mulayam Yadav calls Narendra Modi a liar, says he changes 500 kurtas a day
- Bhavnagar model: Muslim buys house, canât move in
- 12-yr-olds also voted in this Bihar village
- Shazia says Muslims should become 'communal' when they vote
A journalist's plea for direction to the government to adequately reimburse his expenses for appearing as a witness in a corruption case involving former BJP president Bangaru Laxman has been rejected by the Delhi High Court.
Dismissing the plea of journalist Mathew Samuel, who worked earlier with Tehelka magazine, a bench of Chief Justice D Murugesan and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw said, "You should have made the request to the concerned authority. For all these years you were silent and now you want a court order at this stage."
While working with the Tehelka newsportal in May 2001, Samuel had conducted the sting operation named "Operation West End", exposing the corruption in defence deals. The sting had yielded video footage purportedly showing Laxman accepting cash to recommend to the Defence Ministry to purchase a fictitious defence equipment for Army from a fake firm.
In his plea, Samuel, who presently resides in Kerala, had said he has spent 11 years attending various courts, the commissions of inquiry, departmental proceedings, court martial proceedings as a prosecution witness in 12 criminal cases registered by the CBI and also other proceedings but he has been paid only a meagre amount under the Delhi Criminal Court (payment of expenses to complainant and witnesses) Rules.
"In view of the daily attendance required as a witness, the petitioner (Samuel) is not in a position to take up any job of permanent nature....," he said in his plea.
Samuel said the existing system of payment of expenses to the prosecution witness in criminal cases, commissions of inquiry , departmental proceedings, court martial proceedings is "inadequate".
"The amount paid for expenses has no relationship with the actual expenses incurred by the witnesses," he said.
He said as per the rule, for the full day hearing, he is entitled to Rs 275 only which includes his travelling expenses and food.
- Run Away Style
- Stakes high for AIADMK, DMK as TN goes to polls
- Six Bengal constituencies go to poll tomorrow in second phase
- Whistleblower alleged kickbacks, favours in ‘thin client’ procurement; NDA never completed inquiry
- Pune AAP volunteers all set to hit campaign trail in Varanasi
- ‘Interstate’ gang of chain snatchers held; gold worth Rs 80 lakh seized