B'desh jails Abdul Kader Mollah to life for 1971 war crimes
- LIVE: Rahul Gandhi returns to Delhi from sabbatical
- The two critical by-poll results which were overlooked
- 80 crore youth, 160 crore strong hands. What can we not achieve?
- Corporate war between media house, operator confounding net neutrality debate: TRAI chief Rahul Khullar
- Military institute student to son of ex-judge, Islamic State taps Dhaka gen-next
A top leader of the fundamentalist Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) was today sentenced to life by a special Bangladeshi tribunal for committing "crimes against humanity" during the 1971 independence war against Pakistan.
"He (Abdul Kader Mollah) will serve life term," said chairman of the three-member International Crimes Tribunal Justice Obaidul Hassan.
The judgment said five of the six charges brought against the 65-year-old incumbent assistant secretary general of the rightwing party were proved during the trial.
Earlier, Mollah was brought before the court under heavy security vigil. Soon after the verdict, Jamaat supporters clashed with police in parts of the capital, leaving several people injured.
This was the second such judgment by the tribunal in less than three weeks after it awarded death penalty to fugitive Abul Kalam Azad, an anchor of Islamic programmes in a private TV channel and former or expelled JI leader, on January 17.
Mollah was arrested on July 13, 2010, along with fellow party leader Muhammad Qamaruzzaman in front of the Supreme Court premises on charges of crimes against humanity in 1971.
The tribunal indicted him on May 28, 2012 on six specific charges for actively participating, facilitating, aiding and substantially contributing to the attack directed upon the unarmed civilians, "causing commission of the horrific" genocides, murders and rapes.
Attorney-General Mahbube Alam in an instant reaction to media said the verdict "upset us as we expected the capital punishment for the crimes he committed" but the defence counsels were not available for comments.
Alam said the state side would decide later if they would file an appeal against the judgement after a detail review of the judgement