BJP councillor Madhav Prasad acquitted in murder case, complaint found false
- Parliament LIVE: I am a Durga worshipper too, says Smriti Irani in RS
- Economic Survey pegs India's growth at 7-7.5 percent for 2016-17
- Naidu hits back at US envoy: Will they allow Osama anniversary on campus?
- Rail budget: No hike in fares; 3 more freight corridors, cut in goods tariff on its way
- Kansas shooting: Gunman kills up to four, 20 others injured
Besides Prasad, a councillor from Sangam Park, co-accused Anil Yadav and Pinku were also acquitted of the charge of murdering Jai Prakash.
Additional Sessions Judge Pawan Jain acquitted them after prosecution witness Virender Yadav, who claimed to be the eye-witness in the case and on whose complaint the case was registered, turned hostile in the court.
While setting the trio free, the court directed that a complaint be made before the appropriate court against Virender for giving false evidence as he had wrongly stated to police that he saw Prasad and Anil holding Prakash while Pinku stabbed him twice in the chest.
"It can safely be culled out that Virender Yadav had either made a false complaint against the accused persons with some ulterior motive or he turned hostile deliberately on the substantial points in the court with some ulterior motive. Both these situations are not good for the health of the system for administration of criminal justice," the ASJ said.
He noted that "Virender Yadav had not only made a written complaint against the accused persons but he was also pursuing the same vigorously by engaging a battery of advocates."
"Needless to say that witnesses play a significant role in the administration of criminal justice. If courts permit the witnesses to behave in such a manner, it will become difficult to impart justice. If witnesses like Virender are not checked, wrong message would disseminate among the public at large that they can make somersault during trial at any time as per their whims and fancies without facing its consequences.
"Thus, I am of the view that he deserves to face the consequences of his wrongful acts," the court said.
The court directed that a complaint be made against Virender for offence punishable under Section 193 to 195 of the IPC (for giving false evidence).
Police had in April last year registered a case of murder against Prasad, Pinku and Anil on the basis of complaint made by Virender.
He had in a written complaint told the police that on April 10, Prasad had organised a meeting at Azadpur railway station to address voters prior to MCD polls on April 15. He had alleged that in the meeting some persons had said that Prasad had not done any work in his previous tenure, leading to quarrel between them and his supporters.
Virender also told police that during the quarrel, he saw accused Prasad and Anil catch hold of Jai Prakash and Pinku stabbed him twice in his chest with a knife.
However, during his deposition in the court, he said that he had made only those facts in the complaint which some public persons asked him to tell police.
- Railways seems to be on a shopping spree that has nothing to do with capacity augmentation
- Umar Khalid, My Student
- Centre should redirect its energies towards defining and measuring outcomes
- Diary Item: Loathie Garden on Twitter
- For a university to be free, society is obligated to fund it with taxpayer money
- Section 124A should stay