BJP slams Katju's article on Narendra Modi in Pakistan daily


The BJP on Monday attacked Press Council of India chief Markandey Katju for writing an article in a Pakistan daily against the Gujarat government and alleged that he was engaging in political activity while occupying a quasi-judicial post.

In the article in The Express Tribune, Katju had criticised the Narendra Modi-led government and alleged that Muslims did not feel safe under the Modi dispensation.

"The truth is that Muslims in Gujarat fear that if they speak out against the horrors of 2002, they may be attacked and victimised. In the whole of India, Muslims (who are over 200 million of the people of India) are solidly against Modi (though there are a handful of Muslims who for some reasons disagree)," he wrote.

Reacting strongly to this, BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said, "Katju is free to voice his opinion but he has to first answer whether he is occupying a quasi-judicial position or not? "When Supreme Court and high court judges do not engage in political activities, the same should apply to Katju also. He cannot be doing political activity while holding a quasi-judicial post."

Katju alleged that in the 2002 riots, "Muslims were massacred, their homes burnt and other horrible crimes committed against them."

He also refuted claims that Gujarat has progressed under Modi, saying the Chief Minister has only given concessions to big industrial houses and offered them cheap land and electricity in the name of development. He maintained that the standard of living of the people in Gujarat had not improved under Modi.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus