Brain detects grammar errors even when you are unaware
- Nitish Katara murder case: Delhi HC upholds life sentence of Vikas Yadav, two others; calls it honour killing
- Elections 2014 LIVE: Modi says Shastri was the best Congressman; Sonia files nomination from Rae Bareli
- SpiceJet can't sell tickets at Re 1, it is malpractice, says DGCA
- âTehseen names new Indian Mujahideen duo in 2010 Jama Masjid shootingâ
- Five killed as 8.2 magnitude earthquake jolts Chile; tsunami alert issued
Scientists have found hard evidence that people detect and process grammatical errors with no awareness of doing so.
Neuroscientists from the University of Oregon in US recorded brain activity of the participants using electroencephalography, from which researchers focused on a signal known as the Event-Related Potential (ERP).
This non-invasive technique allows for the capture of changes in brain electrical activity during an event. In this case, events were short sentences presented visually one word at a time.
The participants were native-English speaking people, aged between 18 to 30.
Subjects were given 280 experimental sentences, including some that were syntactically (grammatically) correct and others containing grammatical errors, such as "We drank Lisa's brandy by the fire in the lobby," or "We drank Lisa's by brandy the fire in the lobby."
A 50 millisecond audio tone was also played at some point in each sentence. A tone appeared before or after a grammatical faux pas was presented. The auditory distraction also appeared in grammatically correct sentences.
This approach, said lead author Laura Batterink, a postdoctoral researcher, provided a signature of whether awareness was at work during processing of the errors.
"The grammatical violations were fully visible to participants, but because they had to complete this extra task, they were often not consciously aware of the
violations," she said.
"They would read the sentence and have to indicate if it was correct or incorrect. If the tone was played immediately before the grammatical violation, they were more likely to say the sentence was correct even if it wasn't," she added.
When tones appeared after grammatical errors, subjects detected 89 per cent of the errors.
When the tones appeared before the grammatical errors, subjects detected only 51 per cent of them.
The tone before the event, said co-author Helen J Neville, created a blink in their attention.
- ‘Fake’ MBA admission: Iranian girl untraceable as cops busy with polls
- To avoid election duty, teachers flock to doctors to get medical certificates
- Arun Bhatia hopes to get third time lucky
- Congress complains against Narendra Modi for poll code violation
- Flying squads deployed to check flow of liquor and gifts yet to spot offenders
- Flaunt the indelible ink on your finger, and get freebies