CAG objects to Chinese material in bridge across Yamuna in Delhi


The Comptroller and Auditor General has raised serious questions about use of prefabricated steel frames imported from China for construction of the 'Signature' bridge across the Yamuna in East Delhi which is modelled on the famous London Bridge.

In a draft report, the CAG has objected to procurement of steel frames from China in violation of contractual norms and said the Delhi government agency implementing the project does not have any mechanism to check quality of material and fabrication work being done in China.

The CAG has also slammed Delhi government for escalation of the cost of the project by Rs 672 crore against the initial estimate.

The government in March 2006 had estimated a total cost of Rs 459 crore for construction of the bridge which went up to Rs 1,131 crore when the project was finalised in February 2010. The Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation (DTTDC) is executing the Rs 1,131-crore project, which is expected to be completed by mid-2014.

On procurement of materials from China, the auditor said that as per the contractual agreement, fabrication and assembling of steel frames and pylons were to be carried out in three "selected" fabrication workshops or in similar steel assembling factories with approval from the engineer-in-charge of the project. However, the auditor said, the contractor, Gammon-Constutora-Tensacciai, violated the norm by procuring them procured them from the neighbouring country.

The contract was awarded to Gammon-Constutora-Tensacciai in 2010.

Designed as a replica of the London bridge, the 575-metre long and 175-metre-high bridge will have bow-shaped pylon with cables. To be suspended on cables, the bridge will have two approaches the Eastern Approach and the Western Approach. It will link NH-1 on the western bank of Yamuna with Wazirabad on eastern bank of the river.

"It is the primary responsibility of the DTTDC to ensure quality of the material being used in the bridge. This aspect was compromised as DTTDC had no mechanism of its own to ensure quality of material and work being done in China," the draft report said.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus