Calcutta HC declines to initiate suo motu contempt against Mamata Banerjee
- Tera Gurdip bach gaya: Indian on death row in Indonesia tells wife in phone call
- Pune building collapses, at least nine dead
- Mehbooba: Sacrifice of children won’t go waste; securitymen had no idea they were targeting Burhan
- 'Voodoo statistics!' P Chidambaram rejects Arun Jaitley's inflation remarks
- Senior Congress leader Capt Ajay Yadav to quit party
Advising Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to "lace her speech with moderation", the Calcutta High Court on Tuesday declined to initiate suo motu contempt proceedings against her for commenting on the judiciary.
Its reluctance should not be construed as its approval of her 'act', it said.
A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, observed that it was not persuaded by senior counsel Bikash Bhattacharya's submission that the chief minister's speech transcended the "laxmanrekha" of criticism.
The Bench said as such it was unwilling to invoke its powers for issuing contempt rule against the chief minister.
"We, therefore, decline to initiate contempt proceedings," the Bench said.
The court, however, observed "After all the speaker is the chief minister of the state. Her speech should be laced with moderation."
After hearing the verbal prayer for initiating suo motu contempt action, the Bench had yesterday reserved its order on whether it was criticism for betterment of the judiciary or disrespect shown to it.
The Bench had observed that the chief minister was speaking at a seminar on August 14 and everyone could have their own opinion.
It observed that Banerjee had not mentioned any particular case or court.
Bhattacharya had stated that contempt proceedings had been drawn up against Minister of State Becharam Manna by the court for making alleged derogatory comments against the judiciary and as such similar steps be taken against Banerjee.
The court had said in the case of Manna, the allegation was that he had commented against a particular order, but here the alleged comment was not directed against any particular order or court.
During the course of her address at the seminar on August 14, Banerjee had said "What I see. Why should many judgements today be delivered for money? Why? I am sorry to say.
- The amended act legalises child labour while claiming to do the opposite
- The concept of private members’ bill is central to a deliberative democracy
- Mahasweta Devi drew imaginary landscapes to narrate stories of the oppressed
- With the latest figures on industrial output, the case for a stimulus is pressing
- An open letter to new students entering Jawaharlal Nehru University
- Irom Sharmila calling off her fast against the AFSPA reflects the state’s failure to engage