Calcutta HC declines to initiate suo motu contempt against Mamata Banerjee
- SC slams BCCI over Lodha report: Better fall in line, or we will make you fall in line
- SAARC Summit: Now, Bangladesh, Bhutan and Afghanistan say they won't be going to Islamabad
- To isolate Pak, India pulls out of Islamabad SAARC summit
- Global competitiveness index: India jumps 16 ranks for second time, now at 39
- Shimon Peres, last surviving link to Israel's founding fathers, dies at 93
Advising Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to "lace her speech with moderation", the Calcutta High Court on Tuesday declined to initiate suo motu contempt proceedings against her for commenting on the judiciary.
Its reluctance should not be construed as its approval of her 'act', it said.
A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, observed that it was not persuaded by senior counsel Bikash Bhattacharya's submission that the chief minister's speech transcended the "laxmanrekha" of criticism.
The Bench said as such it was unwilling to invoke its powers for issuing contempt rule against the chief minister.
"We, therefore, decline to initiate contempt proceedings," the Bench said.
The court, however, observed "After all the speaker is the chief minister of the state. Her speech should be laced with moderation."
After hearing the verbal prayer for initiating suo motu contempt action, the Bench had yesterday reserved its order on whether it was criticism for betterment of the judiciary or disrespect shown to it.
The Bench had observed that the chief minister was speaking at a seminar on August 14 and everyone could have their own opinion.
It observed that Banerjee had not mentioned any particular case or court.
Bhattacharya had stated that contempt proceedings had been drawn up against Minister of State Becharam Manna by the court for making alleged derogatory comments against the judiciary and as such similar steps be taken against Banerjee.
The court had said in the case of Manna, the allegation was that he had commented against a particular order, but here the alleged comment was not directed against any particular order or court.
During the course of her address at the seminar on August 14, Banerjee had said "What I see. Why should many judgements today be delivered for money? Why? I am sorry to say.
- Power struggle within weakens Samajwadi Party already undergoing an identity crisis in UP
- Preventive detention is being routinised as an instrument of state repression
- The challenge of garbage is set to grow, solid waste management plans need to be implemented
- After Uri, a replay of a 2001 predicament
- Any response to Uri must factor in Pakistani state’s relationship with non-state actors
- It is assumed that Blacks will vote 93 per cent for Clinton, seven per cent for Trump