Cauvery Issue: Karnataka urges PM to reject CMC order

Describing as "unfair and highly disadvantageous" to Karnataka the Cauvery Monitoring Committee's directive to release 12 tmcft of water to Tamil Nadu, Chief Minister Jagadish Shettar today appealed to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to reject it.

In a letter to Singh, Shettar said "the recommendations of the CMC should be rejected by you at the earliest to save the standing crops in Karnataka.."

He also said the order may be kept in abeyance.

The CMC order "is unfair and highly disadvantageous to Karnataka", he said.

He pointed out that at the October 11 meeting of the CMC, it had given a road map of the flow to be received by Tamil Nadu at Biligundlu gauging station considering 41per cent as distress.

The road map for December reducing the interim order releases of 10.37 tmcft by 41 per cent, stipulated 6.12 tmcft. The average discharge to manage 6.12 tmcft would work out to 2285 cusecs", he said.

Even after considering 40.4 per cent as distress,the CMC yesterday ordered 12 tmc ft water to Tamil Nadu during December, Shettar said and added "this is two times of 6.12 tmcft".

Karnataka has already been releasing 10,000 cusecs, complying with the Supreme Court directive two days ago, an action which has drawn flak from farmers and sparked stir in the Cauvery basin districts.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus