CCI chief: Regulators need to be independent, but accountable
- RBI Governor: From Rao and Singh to Modi, why Urjit Patel was a favourite
- Targeting NSCN(K) camp, Indian Army troops entered Myanmar
- J&K: Infiltration bid along LoC foiled, three militants killed in Kupwara
- Punjab: Gau Raksha Dal chief Satish Kumar arrested
- Turkey: 30 killed, 94 hurt in bomb attack at wedding
Amid the debate over regulatory turfs, Competition Commission chief Ashok Chawla on Wednesday said that independence is important for regulators but they should not consider themselves as mini-states.
Chawla, chairman of Competition Commission of India (CCI), said regulators need to be accountable to Parliament.
CCI keeps a tab on anti-competitive pracitces in the market. Recently, there have been differences between CCI and electricity regulator CERC over regulating some areas of the power sector. There have been similar issues involving other regulators as well.
"One cannot have a state of affairs where regulators consider themselves as ultimate state because (sometimes) they have the powers of executive, sometimes they have the powers of judiciary and sometimes they have the powers of legislature also...," Chawla said at a function organised by NGO Cuts International here.
He said that autonomy and accountability are equally important for regulators, as it can't be anybody's case that regulators are a "mini-state" and they can get away with anything, because they are not accountable to anybody.
Regulators need to be, should be and have to be accountable in a larger democratic framework to Parliament, Chawla said. "It is important that they (regulators) are accountable to an appropriate forum and an appropriate body."
- Farm incomes may not revive despite good monsoon
- India’s new line that Pak will have to pay for cross-border terror was overdue
- Just how did Pakistan become so central to the definition of Indian patriotism?
- Why AAP needs to go back to school
- Next door Nepal: Detente in Kathmandu
- PM's Balochistan policy: Gameplan, gambit or gamble?