Contempt relief for Mamata
- Stakes high for BJP, Congress as 11 states go to polls tomorrow; A Raja, Milind Deora in fray
- Arvind Kejriwal beats Narendra Modi in Time magazine's poll of most influential people
- Priyanka Gandhi continues to target Narendra Modi, rakes up snoopgate
- BJP complains to EC over St Xavier principal's criticism of Modi's Guj model of development
- IPL 7 Live Cricket Score, CSK vs RR: RR face stiff CSK challenge in Dubai
High Court Drops plea but tells her to 'lace speech with moderation, temperance'
The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday refused to initiate suo motu criminal contempt proceeding against Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee for her remarks alleging corruption in judiciary. However, the Division Bench of Chief Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Jaymalya Bagchi advised the Chief Minister to "lace her speech with moderation" and added that its decision not to initiate contempt proceedings against her should not be considered as approving her remarks about the judiciary.
On the eve of the Independence Day this year, the Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee while speaking at a seminar in the Assembly had said judgments could be purchased, creating an uproar. Her remark had come in the days following the High Court's decision to term the Singur rehabilitation Act — a signature law enacted by her government — as unconstitutional. Following her remark, several lawyers had urged the High Court to initiate suo motu contempt contempt proceedings against the Chief Minister saying she had maligned the judiciary and people would lose their faith on the constitutional body.
Rejecting the plea, the Division Bench on Tuesday observed that the remarks passed by the Chief Minister did not cross the Lakshmanrekha of scandalising the court or obstructing the administration of justice. The bench also said the Chief Minister was speaking at a seminar and everyone could have their own opinion. It observed Mamata had not mentioned any particular case or court.
However, it added: "We make it clear that our reluctance to initiate suo motu proceedings should not be taken as approval of the statements made by the Chief Minister."
Further it said the comments were made by Chief Minster, a constitutional post. So the High Court expected that she should be laced with moderation and temperance to pass remarks in future, the bench said. "The imputation were neither moderate not couched in temperate language although the same in contextual matter according to us may not constitute an act of criminal proceedings," it went on to add.
- Lalu Prasad hits out at BJP and VHP, says its leaders Giriraj Singh, Praveen Togadia are 'hate mongering'
- Gujarat model a big lie, BJP should clarify: Akhilesh
- Priyanka Gandhi continues to target Narendra Modi, rakes up snoopgate issue
- 2,700 more Muzaffarnagar riots victims apply for relief
- Shazia Ilmi's 'communal muslims' remark: BJP hits out at Aam Aadmi Party
- Battle of Varanasi: Kejriwal tears into Rahul, Modi over 'helicopter democracy'