Controversy after Vladimir Putin compares Lenin to holy relics
- Supreme Court to hear plea today for relook at verdict on gay sex
- J&K Governor calls for talks today, PDP signals phone call from Delhi may bring back BJP alliance
- RBI keeps repo rate unchanged at 6.7%; CRR at 4%
- Raigad: 13 Pune college students drown during picnic at Murud beach
- Zika virus outbreak: WHO declares global emergency
Russian President Vladimir Putin came under criticism from rights activists after he compared Vladimir Lenin's embalmed corpse to the holy relics of Christian saints.
In a Monday speech before a group of supporters, Putin spoke against the idea of removing Lenin's mausoleum from Red Square in Moscow where his corpse is housed.
"Many say the mausoleum contradicts traditions. What contradicts traditions? Go to the Kiev Caves Monastery (in Ukraine) or look at (Russia's) Pskov monastery or Mount Athos (in Greece). There are relics of saints there. You can see everything there," Putin said.
The remarks provoked sharp criticism from rights activists and NGOs such as Memorial, which works to preserve the memory of the victims of Soviet repressions.
"It is an absolutely baseless comparison," said Memorial board member Yan Rachinsky yesterday.
"If someone needs these relics, one could build a special 'communist church' somewhere," he said.
Debates on whether or not to remove Lenin's body from the mausoleum constructed in Red Square in 1924 started after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
But Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov quashed any suggestion that Lenin's remains should be interred.
- Ten years on, MGNREGA requires constant review. And consistency in political support
- The global economy is in trouble but India is attracting positive comment
- India’s expanding stakes in US demand a more strategic view of their changing politics
- Supreme Court has an opportunity to rectify its ruling on Section 377
- And everyone loves censorship — or so it seemed, at a session at the Jaipur Lit Fest
- The problem in Arunachal is as much about politics as about institutional norms