Couples who get a pet before a baby 'likelier to last'
- BJP relents to Chandrababu Naidu's demands, alliance likely to continue
- PMO defends Manmohan Singh, says GDP has grown three times during UPA rule
- Kumar Vishwas files application alleging threat to life from Rahul and Priyanka
- Vote for Supriya Sule or lose water, âthreatensâ Ajit Pawar
- IPL 7 Live Cricket Score, KXIP vs CSK: CSK lose Smith, McCullum after flying start against KXIP
Couples who choose to take in a cat or a dog, can be making a more active sign of commitment to their future than even having a baby.
The Marriage Foundation, the think-tank set up by the High Court judge Sir Paul Coleridge, which studies marriage and relationships, and the law firm Seddons commissioned a survey of 3,500 adults to find their views on what promotes stability, the Telegraph reported.
People surveyed were asked to rate acts like buying a house or opening a joint bank account in terms of how important a sign of commitment they are.
Having a child was rated just ahead of getting married and buying a house together, with an average score of eight out of 10 from those polled.
Including a partner in a will was rated as more significant than opening a joint account while buying a pet together scored just under five out of 10 on average.
- As EC website crashes due to overload, party workers use apps to locate voters
- An entire society in Kothrud could not vote
- Chaos, anger across city over missing names
- Mulayam pushes third front, says will stake claim to PM post
- Don’t look at my candidates, votes for me: Maya to Dalits
- AAP biggies focus on Vishwas, Kejri seats, other units suffer