Court gives British Columbia man chance to prove seized $1 mn is his

So near and yet, so far! But the second chance at riches is hanging tantalisingly over a hapless man.

A British Columbia man is getting another chance to prove he is the legal owner of nearly $1 million that Nevada state troopers seized from his rental car during an August 2008 traffic stop near Las Vegas.

Three 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges ruled Monday that U.S. District Judge Kent Dawson in Las Vegas improperly used a possession standard instead of determining ownership before denying Michael Simard's claim to the $999,830.

The Nevada Highway Patrol said the money was in a duffel bag in the trunk of the rental car Simard was driving from St. Louis to Las Vegas.

"Bags aren't mine. Money isn't mine,'' Simard wrote on a statement that troopers accepted before confiscating the money and letting him drive away with a warning about speeding. Troopers had clocked him going 79 mph (127 kph) in a 75 mph (120 kph) zone.

"A lot of times, people disclaim ownership at the scene of a stop because police say they can leave,'' Simard's California-based attorney, Ronald Richards, said Tuesday.

But Simard later submitted a sworn declaration that the money - just $170 short of $1 million - belonged to him. The appeals court panel ruled that such an "unequivocal assertion of ownership'' should have prompted a more thorough hearing by Dawson.

Court documents say Simard had a Canadian driver's license and gave a trooper who stopped him on Interstate 15 permission to search the vehicle. Police noted that Simard had a one-way car rental, seemed nervous and gave various accounts about whom he would be meeting and where he would be staying. He had few clothes or belongings with him for what he said was a long cross-country trip.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus