CPM questions Narendra Modi's silence on price rise in Gujarat
- India's future cannot exist without the future of Kashmir: Rajnath Singh
- Will appoint nodal officer to help Kashmiri youth across the country: Rajnath Singh in Srinagar
- Dec 16 Delhi gangrape case: Convict attempts suicide inside Tihar Jail, rushed to hospital
- Earthquake in Italy kills 247, toll may rise as rescuers continue hunt for survivors
- Rahul Gandhi twisting statement, must show generosity, apologise: RSS
Questioning Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi's silence on the rise in prices of essential commodities, Communist Party of India (Marxist) politburo member Brinda Karat lashed out at him at a rally here.
"Narendra Modi is asking Prime Minister Manmohan Singh why is he silent on rising prices. But why is Narendra Modi silent on rise in prices of essential commodities in Gujarat?
"The price of milk has been hiked sixteen times since 2006, while that of edible oil has seen 300 per cent rise. There has been unprecedented rise in power tariffs also," Karat said.
'Vibrant Gujarat' event was only for corporates and the rich, while the poor and the marginalised had been left to fend for themselves, she said.
"Why is Modi silent when the Supreme Court and Gujarat High Court have said the state government's Rs 8,000 crore gift to Essar, a corporate giant, was 'illegal'?" the CPM politburo member asked.
She also took on Modi for allegedly spending crores of rupees on campaigning through 3-D telecast technology. "When the state government has done nothing, it has to resort to such tactics. To magnify whatever little work it has done, the state is spending crores on 3-D technology," she alleged.
Gujarat was lagging behind on social indicators such as hunger, malnutrition, payment of wages and food security, she said.
- Sedition law cannot be used against honest views, expressed peacefully
- India’s dependence on China for medicine ingredients is a matter of concern
- Before Balochistan, India has supported some human rights causes and ignored others
- Olympics brought many smiles — and a little bit of rancour
- Harish Gupta case involves questions about the very nature of governmental decision-making
- Tension between the executive and judiciary could play out in creative, or destructive, ways