Criminalising gay sex is against constitutional values, SC told

Gay rights activists today submitted in Supreme Court that criminalising homosexual acts is against constitutional values and that the law should not interfere when consenting adults are involved.

Naz Foundation, an NGO working for the welfare and rehabilitation of HIV infected people, contended that homosexuals face social ostracism with gay sex being declared as an offence.

Appearing before a bench of justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya, the NGO supported the Delhi High Court verdict decriminalising gay sex among consenting adults in private which was earlier an offence punishable up to life imprisonment.

"They are (homosexuals) our brothers and sisters and citizens of the country. If they cannot express their sexuality then they are second class citizens of the country.

It is against our constitutional values," advocate Anand Grover, appearing for the NGO, said.

"It amounts to demeaning their worth and marginalising them in society. They are not able to reveal their sexual expression as it has been made an offence in society. Even incest is not an offence," he further said.

Countering the arguments of social and religious organisations that gay sex is immoral, he said that such acts among consenting adults is private affair and law should not interfere.

"It is not an issue of public morality but about private morality and purpose of law is not to interfere in private morality," he said.

The apex court is hearing petitions filed by anti-gay rights activists as also by political, social and religious organisations, challenging the Delhi High Court verdict decriminalising gay sex as provided in Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Section 377 (unnatural offences) of the IPC makes gay sex a criminal offence entailing punishment up to life term.

Senior BJP leader B P Singhal, who had opposed in the high court the plea for legalisation of gay sex, has challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court, saying such acts are illegal, immoral and against ethos of Indian culture.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus