CRPF rejects application signed in capital letters, HC disagrees
- Priyanka Gandhi denies report on fighting polls against Modi, says her focus remains Rae Bareli and Amethi
- After Sanjay Baru, former coal secretary Parakh's book embarrasses PM; 'Singh had little political authority'
- Two yrs after townâs first-ever riots, Kosi Kalan shadow hangs large over Mathura
- Modi in TN, Jaya first time targets BJP
- Election Live: Vajpayee weekest PM, tweets Sanjay Jha; Congress insulting Ambedkar by taking credit for laws, says Modi
Pawan Kumar had all qualifications for a job with the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), except for one — his signature was in capital letters.
Kumar realised how much this habit cost him only after he was refused employment with the CRPF as the signature on his application form was in capital letters. This meant that his form was treated as "not valid" and his requests to the force went unheard.
The rejection made Kumar wonder that if thumb impression was considered valid authorisation, how is a signature in capital letters invalid? To find the answer, Kumar took the question to the Delhi High Court.
In court, he asked if impressions of thumbs could be differentiated by different modes of scrutiny, signatures by different people in capital letters could also be distinguished.
His petition said the signature has to be based absolutely on his wish to be represented in a certain manner and why curtail this right by putting unreasonable restrictions. "It is strange that a person is even dictated for choosing the manner he wants to represent himself. Where is my liberty?" his lawyer submitted before the court.
The counsel for the government adduced the contentions signing in capital leads to confusion and is susceptible to be forged.
"There are forms that ask a candidate to fill up in capital letters. Now, if he also signs in capital letters, it is bound to create confusion since the machines that check the forms are not fed with such instructions," the lawyer said.
The bench led by Justice Pradeep Nandarajog did not favour the arguments against signing in capital. The court asked if there was a law that imposed such a prohibition.
"We cannot say if there is such a law, but the practice has been such," the counsel answered.
- Security men at every step, Shinde keeps ‘safe distance’ from voters, debunks charges
- In Beed, Modi factor dents Munde’s goodwill among Muslims
- Ambareesh campaigns for Nilekani
- Raids on Bellary moneylender yield Rs 8.74 crore cash
- MP faces Amreli villagers’ ire in campaign
- JERC approves sale of solar power at Rs 1.13 per unit