Delhi gangrape: Sentencing on Friday, prosecution demands death for convicts
- Why Germanwings flight A320 might have crashed over the French Alps
- Indian Navy surveillance aircraft crashes in Goa; two officers missing
- Section 66A: 21 individuals whose petitions changed the system
- Government is willing to compromise on land bill: Venkaiah Naidu
- A little reminder: No one in House debated Section 66A, Congress brought it and BJP backed it
In the course of arguments spread over nearly three hours on Wednesday, the prosecutor demanded the death penalty in order to assuage "society's conscience", while the counsel for defence sought mercy on grounds of the young age and extreme poverty of the convicts.
"Society today feels that no woman in this country is safe... Now it is up to the court to decide and change this," special prosecutor Dayan Krishnan said in conclusion to his arguments.
Advocate V K Anand, counsel for Mukesh Singh, the younger brother of alleged ringleader Ram Singh who was found dead in his Tihar cell in March, invoked the tragedy of the men's mother.
"Main iski ma ki taraf se aapse daya ki bheekh mangta hoon," Anand said. "His mother has already lost a son. Like the victim's mother, she too is asking for justice." Besides, Anand argued, "Mukesh was driving the bus, how could he know what was happening?"
The defence lawyers submitted that all the accused could not be held equally liable. "Death penalty must relate to the criminal and not to the crime," argued Vivek Sharma, counsel for Pawan Gupta.
The four men — Mukesh, Pawan, Vinay Sharma and Akshay Thakur — were seated in the last row behind a protective wall of policemen, and rose to their feet several times as the arguments progressed. Their families were not present in the court. The parents of the victim were present, and reacted visibly to the arguments being made in a mix of Hindi and English.