Donít have 7/11 call records, ATS tells HC
- Jigisha Ghosh murder case: Two convicts get death sentence, life imprisonment for one
- Ban pellet guns in Kashmir, Omar Abdullah-led delegation asks PM Modi
- PM Modi, Afghan President Ghani jointly inaugurate renovated Stor Palace
- AAP doesn't have money to fight election: Kejriwal
- Kicking off UP poll campaign, Mayawati slams BJP-RSS, SP, is soft on Congress
The Maharashtra anti-terrorism squad (ATS) probing the 2006 suburban train blasts told the Bombay High Court (HC) on Tuesday it no longer had call data records (CDRs) of the accused. The 7/11 blasts had killed 188 and injured 823.
The Indian Express reported on Tuesday that the ATS had told the special MCOCA court that the call records of the 13 accused in the case had been destroyed.
"It (CDRs) was there, that much is clear. If the material is not relied on (by the prosecution) in the chargesheet, after a year or so it is destroyed. Today, we don't have it. That's the reality," Advocate General D J Khambata told the court today.
He said the data analysis cell (DAC) of ATS had procured CDRs of the accused. But the records were later deleted.
The 13 alleged SIMI members facing trial for the 7/11 blasts had moved HC in September challenging the MCOCA special court's order refusing to allow examination of three DCPs who allegedly recorded statements of three Indian Mujahideen members and production of CDRs the ATS was using against them. IM had claimed responsibility for all blasts in the country after 2005.
Defence lawyer Yug Chaudhary argued that the ATS had made "tall claims" about the accused having links with Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT). "If the CDRs had evidence showing links with LeT, would they (ATS) destroy them?" he said.
Chaudhary said the prosecution did not tell the trial court that the CDRs had been destroyed. "They said they would not produce what they are not relying on," he said.
Justice A M Thipsay observed: "Nobody can dispute the relevance of this (CDRs). There is logical relevance."
Chaudhary said a nodal officer from Bihar submitted in the trial court that they preserved CDRs for a year but could retrieve older ones in about three-four months.
- Farm incomes may not revive despite good monsoon
- India’s new line that Pak will have to pay for cross-border terror was overdue
- Just how did Pakistan become so central to the definition of Indian patriotism?
- Why AAP needs to go back to school
- Next door Nepal: Detente in Kathmandu
- PM's Balochistan policy: Gameplan, gambit or gamble?