Drones are grey
- Fresh tremors felt in Nepal as death toll crosses 4,000 mark
- Nepal Earthquake: At Kathmandu Airport, a bit of panic, a lot of paranthas and puri
- Paid Rs 320 for a bottle of water, Nepal quake survivors recall the horror
- Nepal earthquake: First hand account from a mountaineer
- Even moderate tremors can cause heavy casualties in Delhi: Experts
Questions about the US's drone strikes refuse to go away. More clarity is needed.
On October 29, American legislators will, for the first time, hear testimonies from the civilian victims of a drone attack in Pakistan. Coming as it does in the context of two deeply critical reports released earlier this week, the debate around the US drone programme has been reignited. To say that the Obama administration's policy on surgical bomb strikes conducted via drones, based on intelligence on the locations of al-Qaeda operatives and other terrorists in places like Pakistan and Yemen, has been controversial would be an understatement. Official claims of civilian casualties are viewed with deep suspicion, in part because of statements like current CIA director John Brennan's improbable assertion in 2011 that "there hasn't been a single collateral death because of the exceptional proficiency, precision of the capabilities that we've been able to develop"
Such strikes have also become a contentious issue in the fraught relationship between the US and Pakistan. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, visiting the US, called upon the latter to "end drone attacks" ahead of a meeting with President Obama. Anti-American sentiment among the Pakistani people is high, and the drone strikes are thought to be a contributing factor. Earlier this year, a leaked internal Pakistani document found that the number of civilian casualties was lower than claimed by Pakistani politicians — but still higher than that admitted by the US government.