EC agrees to amend rule on seizure of cash in Gujarat polls
- BJP unhappy over Gadkari-Raj meeting, says it's a closed chapter
- You told us go to hell, says Supreme Court, sends Subrata Roy to jail
- Special circumstances forced govt to take ordinance route: Salman Khurshid
- Nitin Gadkari-Raj Thackeray closeness could 'affect' alliance, hints Shiv Sena
- TRS wonât merge, Congress readies to walk alone in both Andhra and Bihar
The Election Commission today agreed before the Supreme Court to amend its blanket order for seizing cash amount above Rs 2.5 lakh in transit during the Gujarat assembly elections.
Appearing before a bench of justices D K Jain and Madan B Lokur, Commission's counsel senior advocate Ashok Desai that the poll panel's July 2012 order will be dropped and amended provision will be placed in the Instruction on Election Expenditure Monitoring order.
After hearing the Commission's plea, the bench first allowed it to amend instruction and passed the order at around 2.30 pm to incorporate the changed provision.
But the matter was again mentioned at 4 pm by the Bhagyoday Jan Parishad and Gujarat Chamber of Commerce and Industry, which contended that the amended provision is not clear.
The bench then posted the matter for further hearing on Friday.
The bench was hearing an Election Commission's appeal against the Gujarat High Court order which had quashed its orders for seizing cash above Rs 2.5 lakh saying that it was unconstitutional.
The high court, on a PIL by Bhagyoday Jan Parishad and Gujarat Chamber of Commerce and Industry, had on November 9 said that EC's directive to randomly search and seize 'in-transit' cash above Rs 2.5 lakh in poll-bound Gujarat was "unconstitutional" and directed it to immediately stop such operations.
"The instructions by the EC which empower its officers to randomly search any vehicle and seize cash above Rs 2.5 lakh is ultra vires (beyond powers) being violative of Article 21 of the Constitution, and also beyond the powers conferred on the EC," the high court had said.
"We direct the EC that (such) instructions shall not be implemented and there shall not be any indiscriminate or random search or seizure of any vehicle, unless there is any reliable or credible information with the EC," it had said.