Eight get life term for murder in Court premises 11 years ago

Pintoo ShirkeA local Indian court sentenced eight persons to life imprisonment in connection to the Pintoo Shirke Murder case, 2002. (Reuters)

A local court has sentenced eight persons, including a former Corporator, to life imprisonment for murdering a history-sheeter in the court premises at Nagpur in June 2002.

Over 11 years after the sensational killing of Pintoo Shirke, a notorious goon, on the premises of Nagpur District and Sessions Court, eight persons, who, too, have criminal background, were found guilty.

District and Additional Sessions Judge S D Jagmalani handed life imprisonment to them on Friday. Those convicted include Vijay Mate, a former Corporator.

The Court, however, acquitted six other accused for lack of evidence. Among 16 arrested in the case, one Sachin Gawande passed away in May this year, while another Raju Gaikwad is still at large.

The Judge pronounced the verdict in a jam-packed courtroom and police had maintained strict vigil inside and outside the premises.

Shirke was murdered by a group of assailants on the sixth floor of the court on June 19, 2002, while he was being brought with three others for proceedings in a murder case.

The killing was said to be an outcome of dispute over encroachment by Mate, then a Corporator, on a property belonging to Shirke. About 39 eyewitnesses, 10 of them policemen, were examined by the Court.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus