Electroshocks for mentally ill patients to be banned
- Mali hostage crisis ends as security forces gun down militants; 27 killed
- Sheena Bora case: Peter charged with murder, criminal conspiracy
- Nitish Kumar sworn in as Bihar Chief Minister; Lalu's sons in Cabinet
- UP keeps its distance from Bihar: Why Mulayam, Akhilesh didn't attend Nitish swearing-in
- Madras HC stays cancellation of Greenpeace India registration
The pre-Independence direct electro-convulsive therapy (ECT) — generally known as electroshock — used to treat mentally ill patients, may soon be banned in India. Recommended for patients with severe depression who do not respond to other treatments, the therapy — if necessary — would be given only under the "influence of anesthesia".
Introduced in 1940, the ECT is a psychiatric treatment in which seizures are electrically induced in patients for therapeutic effect.
The Union Health Ministry, which on Tuesday held consultations with state government officials, doctors and administrators involved in the administration of the District Mental Health Programme to give final shape to the proposed Mental Health Care Bill, 2010, decided to do away with direct ECT.
"Even though the Health Ministry recommended a ban on the whole procedure, psychiatrists felt it should be allowed under anesthesia as in some cases it is a life-saving exercise," said a senior official.
The experts, however, agreed to ban the ECT on minors. Direct ECT is harmful as it leads to bone fractures and full seizures in many cases, say experts. "To totally ban ECT is wrong. But direct ECT should be banned. ECT under the influence of anesthesia, too, should be sparingly used," said Dr Nimesh Desai, director, Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences.
- Modi can leverage foreign policy to repair his domestic image
- Muslims biggest losers from our reservation policy, one that Bhagwat rightly wants reviewed
- If Pak state really cared for its people, it would put national economy above all else
- Despite little coverage in India, the Argentinian presidential election is significant
- Uday lacks a strong, accessible monitoring mechanism critical for its success
- What Mr Mani Shankar Aiyar won’t say