Ever tried to find out state of minorities? HC poser to govt
- Vote for Supriya Sule or lose water, âthreatensâ Ajit Pawar
- Nobel laureate Gabriel Garcia Marquez dies at 87
- 5th phase of elections: Moderate to high turnout on biggest voting day
- Dhowan takes over as Navy Chief, superseded Sinha resigns
- Election Commission lifts ban on BJP leader Amit Shah after he promises to behave
Full-bench was hearing PILs over central scholarships for minority community students.
The Gujarat High Court Tuesday asked the state government whether it had taken steps in the past 20 years to ascertain social and educational backwardness of Muslims and other minorities in the state.
The question was raised by the five-judge full bench during the hearing on PILs over the central government's scheme for pre-metric scholarship to students belonging to minority communities.
The central government scheme launched in 2008 is for students belonging to five religious minorities, including Muslims, whose parents have annual income below Rs 1 lakh where the Centre gives 75 per cent of the scholarship amount while states are to bear the cost of the remaining 25 per cent.
The Gujarat government has refused to implement the scheme.
During the hearing, when the advocate general was arguing against the central scheme, Justice V M Sahai pointedly asked, "Have you formed any committee to find out the social and educational backwardness of Muslims living in the state? What has the state done in the past 20 years?" To which Advocate General Kamal Trivedi conceded there was no study conducted by the state government.
Earlier, during the submissions in support of the state government's refusal to implement the scheme, Trivedi said it was discriminatory in nature.
Citing constitutional provisions and Supreme Court judgments, Trivedi argued that the Central government did not come up with notification defining the five religious groups as socially and economically backward that could be the beneficiaries of the scheme.
He also contended that the state could extend benefit only to those groups or communities identified as socially and educationally backward by a permanent commission set up for that purpose.
The Bench commented that an executive order for the purpose of the advancement of the weaker sections should be upheld keeping in mind the philosophy of affirmative action of the state.
- As EC website crashes due to overload, party workers use apps to locate voters
- An entire society in Kothrud could not vote
- Chaos, anger across city over missing names
- Mulayam pushes third front, says will stake claim to PM post
- Don’t look at my candidates, votes for me: Maya to Dalits
- AAP biggies focus on Vishwas, Kejri seats, other units suffer