Ex-Goldman trader's fraud caused $118 mln loss: US regulator

Goldman Sachs Group

U.S. regulators on Thursday accused a former Goldman Sachs Group Inc trader of defrauding the Wall Street bank of $118 million in a scheme of fabricated trades and fake entries.

In a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Manhattan, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) said Matthew Marshall Taylor had manually entered fake trades in November and December 2007, in an attempt to conceal an $8.3 billion position in futures contracts.

The scheme cost the bank $118.44 million, the CFTC said.

By entering fabricated trades and concealing the position ... (the) defendant engaged in fraudulent acts and practices, the civil fraud complaint said. Taylor's fabricated trades had the effect of concealing and misrepresenting the size of his e-mini futures position within his employer's internal systems.

The CFTC is seeking a $130,000 civil penalty against Taylor, who currently resides in Florida, the complaint said.

Ross Intelisano, a lawyer for Taylor, could not immediately be reached for comment.

The CFTC complaint did not name Goldman but referred to Taylor's employer at the time of the suspected fraud only as a large Futures Commission merchant.

However, broker records from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Wall Street's industry funded regulator, showed that Taylor was discharged from Goldman in Dec. 2007 for alleged conduct related to inappropriately large proprietary futures positions in a firm trading account.

A Goldman Sachs spokeswoman said the bank had terminated Taylor's employment after his suspected conduct had been discovered, and that customer funds had not been affected.

The trader provided false explanations when confronted about irregularities we detected in his account during the December 14, 2007 trading day, Goldman spokeswoman Tiffany Galvin said in a statement.

The complaint said that as Taylor's supervisors began questioning him about discrepancies in his numbers, Taylor at one point falsely represented that he had misbooked a trade or put too many zeroes in the quantity field.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views expressed in comments published on indianexpress.com are those of the comment writer's alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of The Indian Express Group or its staff. Comments are automatically posted live; however, indianexpress.com reserves the right to take it down at any time. We also reserve the right not to publish comments that are abusive, obscene, inflammatory, derogatory or defamatory.