Ex-USADA chief Terry Madden says Lance Armstrong rep offered payment: report

Lance Armstrong

Former US Anti-Doping Agency chief Terry Madden told US media that Lance Armstrong did offer USADA a donation in 2004, contrary to the shamed cyclist's claim in a confessional TV interview.

Armstrong's vehement denial of the claim made by current USADA chief executive Travis Tygart, came in the second installment of his pre-recorded interview with talk-show host Oprah Winfrey, which aired on Friday.

"This is another personal attack on Travis Tygart and the United States Anti-Doping Agency," Madden, chief executive of the agency from 2000-2007, told the New York Daily News yesterday.

Tygart said in an interview with Showtime television's "60 Minutes Sports" last week that an Armstrong representative called the agency in 2004 and offered a USD 250,000 "donation".

"That is not true," Armstrong told Winfrey, telling her he "asked around" among his camp to see if someone had made the offer without his knowledge.

"That's a lot of money," Armstrong said. "I would know."

But Madden, who hasn't commented publicly on doping matters since his tenure at USADA ended, told both ESPN.com and the Daily News that he remembered the day that Tygart, then USADA's general counsel, received the call.

"Travis received a telephone call from one of Lance's closest representatives, who offered to make a contribution to USADA," Madden told the Daily News.

He said Tygart reported the call to him, and "within 30 seconds" Madden told Tygart to call back and reject the offer, since a donation from a person who could be drug-tested by the agency would be improper.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus