'FDI in multi-brand retail would result in huge unemployment'
- Election LIVE: BJP's third candidate list out, Ram Kripal to contest from Patliputra against Lalu's daughter
- Show us the money, Supreme Court says, refuses bail to Subrata Roy
- December 16 gangrape: Delhi High Court upholds death to four convicts
- Minority panel removed my riot report against Modi: Ex-Secy
- Prospects dim, Congress finding it hard to get many of its MPs to run for Lok Sabha
Describing Bharatiya Janata Party as pro-reforms, BJP president Rajnath Singh, has defended it's decision to oppose Foreign Direct Investment in multi-brand retail arguing that such a move would aggravate the unemployment problem in India. Asserting that the BJP is open to more FDI in the Indian economy, Singh said his party is however opposed to the FDI in multi-brand retail. "We believe that retail trade is a traditional sector, which provides employment to 50 million people. They have traditional skill in retail trade.
"So bringing in FDI in multi-brand retail would result in unemployment problem in the country. So we have reservations related to FDI in multi-brand retail sector," Singh told a Indian reporters yesterday in a media interaction here. However, BJP is a pro-economic reform party, he said. "It was the NDA Government led by Atal Bihari Vajpayee which gave the maximum impetus to economic reform and
accelerated the process," he added.
"The impression that BJP is against economic reforms is not correct. We are pro economic reforms," he said. Singh refuted the allegations that the Congress-led UPA Government can't carry on major economic reform ahead of the next year's general elections because the main opposition parties like the BJP are not letting the Parliament function. "It is not the case that Parliament has not functioned in the past nine years," he said in response to a question.
During his stay in Washington, Singh met a host of leaders of the US corporate sector and listened to their concerns about India. In his meetings, Singh raised the concerns of Indian IT industry sector on certain provisions, in particular those related to the H-1B and L1 visas in the comprehensive immigration bill. This needs to be addressed by the United States, as this will badly impact the Indian IT companies, he argued.