Finn mulls shortening run-up to get rid of ‘annoying’ stump-kicking habit

Finn

England fast bowler Steven Finn has said that he is close to getting rid of his habit of hitting the stumps during delivery by shortening his run-up, ahead of the upcoming back-to-back Ashes series. Finn, who had been warned by umpires on International Cricketing Council (ICC) instructions that his delivery would be considered a dead ball if he repeats his habit, said that he would be shortening his run-up to remove the problem, and added that it would give him more control and bounce, the Telegraph reports. However, the right-arm fast bowler further said that it is difficult to find time to perfect any adjustments because of the large workload of the team, and added that although he had a lot of practice on the nets to get rid of his habit, it is still early to try the shorter run-up in an unknown game. Finn, who had got into trouble with the ICC because of South African captain Graeme Smith complaining about his habit, said that he bore no ill-will towards Smith as it helped him to take charge of his action. Finn further said that his habit is a technical flaw in his bowling action, and removing it is important so that England does not lose any more wickets. The 6 ft 8 in Finn runs 25.7 metres before propelling a cricket ball at speeds of up to 93mph. For batsmen, he is a challenging prospect, albeit one who is compromised whenever he breaks the stumps with his right knee

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus