Firm under probe for MP coal blocks also got Chhattisgarh ore reserves
- 15 security personnel killed as Naxals attack CRPF convoy in Chhattisgarh
- Malaysia military believes it has tracked missing jet over Strait of Malacca
- Bhagwat cautions RSS cadres against crossing limits for BJP
- Narendra Modi's new found love for Bihar a ploy to win votes: Nitish Kumar
- Dalit teen canât pay to cheat in exam, immolates himself
In April this year, the CBI raided the premises of Pushp Steel and Mines Ltd in Chhattisgarh, Delhi and other states in connection with alleged irregularities in the allotment of coal blocks.
The firm, like some others being investigated in the case, is accused of giving false information to obtain a coal block in Chhindwara, Madhya Pradesh, and two of its directors, Atul Jain and Sanjay Jain, are named in the FIR.
Investigation by The Indian Express has found that much before it got embroiled in the coal blocks allotment controversy, the company had obtained iron ore reserves in Chhattisgarh allegedly in a similar dubious manner and with the active support of the state government.
In fact, the allotment of iron ore reserves to PSML in Chhattisgarh became the basis for the company getting coal blocks in Madhya Pradesh.
However, PSML eventually lost the Rs 12,000 crore iron ore reserves after the Delhi High Court quashed the Chhattisgarh government's recommendation for prospecting lease (PL) to a firm which had an authorised share capital of just Rs 1 lakh.
The court said the decision of the Chhattisgarh government — whose Chief Minister Raman Singh also holds the mining portfolio — to recommend a prospecting lease to PSML was "unsustainable in law" and slammed it for "unreasonableness of the action". A prospecting lease allows a company to survey the mining site, collect samples and gauge the potential of the area before getting a mining lease.
The state government has now asked PSML for an explanation in the light of the high court ruling after apparently flouting norms to recommend the mining lease to the company. PSML, meanwhile, has challenged the high court ruling in the Supreme Court.
Raman Singh said he had not favoured PSML in any way and it was chosen in a transparent manner. "We withheld their leases after realising that they were not taking any step to begin production," he told The Indian Express.
- Eight held for ‘attacking’ Dalit wedding procession in Sabarkantha
- 90 airports on alert to check movement of cash ahead of elections
- Notices to 23 hospitals for withdrawing facility
- Sindhis threaten to move HC if Sindhu Sagar not cleaned
- In Mumbai, teacher’s love story with student ends in her arrest
- Govt dismisses AAP allegations
- AAP workers stage protest outside Kejriwal’s residence over ticket distribution
- BJP boycotts NDTV over news gaffe | The Indian Express
- Out of the promised 50,000 homes for the poor, not even 50 constructed in Gujarat by BJP: Kejriwal
- Kejriwal Gujarat tour: The unfamiliar politician | The Indian Express