Get fresh warrant to produce accused in Delhi court, ATS told
- Haji Ali dargah will have to open doors for women after Bombay HC ruling
- My vision for India is rapid transformation, not gradual evolution: PM Modi
- Panel works on alternative to pellets: Balls of pepper, capsicum gas
- Scorpene leak: Firms to be blacklisted only in cases of clear criminality, says Parrikar
- Sheena Bora murder: Taped conversations emerging on media submitted in court, says CBI
The Maharashtra ATS has been asked to file a fresh production warrant for the four Pune blast accused currently in judicial custody in Delhi after it was found that the warrant of the JMFC court, Pune, asking for the production of the four suspected IM men on October 30, had expired.
The court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) in Delhi on Friday asked the Pune ATS, whose application had been held pending for the past month, due to issues of jurisdiction of the courts to hear cases under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, to get a fresh production warrant on Monday.
The ATS had approached the CMM court with the production application in October after the arrest of Maharashtra residents Asad Khan, Imran Khan, Feroze alias Hamza and Irfan Mustafa Landge by the Delhi Police Special Cell for allegedly planning strikes in the Capital during Dussehra and Diwali. The four are also the prime suspects in the serial blasts case in Pune in August.
The application, filed on October 26, was kept pending since the counsel for the accused had raised objections regarding the power of the CMM to remand an accused in a case covered under the NIA Act. The case had then been transferred to a Sessions Judge.
Advocate Mehmood Pracha, appearing for Irfan Landge, had also raised objection to the warrant issued by a magisterial court in Pune on similar grounds of jurisdiction.
After hearing the arguments from both the prosecution and the advocates for the accused, Additional Sesssions Judge Asha Menon on Friday sent the Pune ATS application back to the CMM court, stating that since the application was in relation to a production warrant by a Mumbai court, the Pune ATS plea was essentially an application for a transit remand. "Irrespective of whether the CMM has the jurisdiction to try a case, it is that court which deals with applications under s 267 CrPC and is authorised to permit the removal of a person in judicial custody in Delhi to another place outside Delhi in terms of s 267 CrPC," said the ASJ.
- Pakistan army has a battle to win: The corruption within
- Anger of Irom Sharmila’s supporters should not be dismissed as selfishness or cynicism
- You keep the cow’s tail: A post card from Una, Gujarat, August 15
- History shows why Balochistan is not an internal matter of Pakistan
- The use of technology will be key to making GST a success
- Sedition law cannot be used against honest views, expressed peacefully