Goodbye to all that
- Rail Budget 2015: No hike in passenger fares, Prabhu promises modern rail network
- Rail Budget: Ally Shiv Sena not satisfied, but Mulayam says Prabhu has done a 'good job'
- Rail Budget futuristic and passenger centric: PM Modi
- PDP, BJP thrash out differences; all clear for Mufti-Modi meeting tomorrow
- Hummer horror: Senior policeman suspended for secretly meeting Kerala businessman
Gambia's exit from the Commonwealth raises questions about the organisation's relevance
Given its reputation as a harmless vestige of the once-sprawling British empire, it was somewhat startling when Gambia's president, Yahya Jammeh, decried the Commonwealth as a "neocolonial institution" and announced his nation's exit from the 54-member club. It has been suggested that Britain's strained relationship with Jammeh — he has accused it of aiding his political opponents — and its criticism of his human rights record might have contributed to the decision. Yet, Gambia's withdrawal, the first since Robert Mugabe pulled Zimbabwe out a decade ago, also raises questions over the Commonwealth's relevance.
For the general public in many of the Commonwealth's member countries, the most consequential aspect of membership is the athletic games held every four years. At a time when international organisations appear to be proliferating, from the BRICS to the G-20, the Commonwealth is caught in an existential crisis over its role. Its operations are constrained by its small budget and staff. It cannot substantially support development programmes, and most member countries rely on it only for minimal technical assistance.