Government to maintain existing foodgrains allocation in Food Bill
- Fresh tremors felt in Nepal as death toll crosses 4,000 mark
- Nepal Earthquake: At Kathmandu Airport, a bit of panic, a lot of paranthas and puri
- Paid Rs 320 for a bottle of water, Nepal quake survivors recall the horror
- Nepal earthquake: First hand account from a mountaineer
- Even moderate tremors can cause heavy casualties in Delhi: Experts
A day after many states expressed reservation on provisions of the Food Bill, the Centre today assured them it will continue with the Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) and current foodgrains allocation in the revised Bill.
The Bill is likely to be presented in the Budget session of Parliament.Currently, the poorest of poor under AAY are entitled for 35 kg of foodgrains per family every month at a cheapest price of Rs 2/kg wheat and Rs 3/kg rice.
"Yesterday, we had lengthy discussion with states. Except for Tamil Nadu, others have welcomed the bill with their own suggestions...The general feeling among states is that AAYsection need to be protected. We also feel the same," Food Minister K V Thomas told reporters here.
"States have also suggested protection of current allocation of foodgrains. We are almost agreeable to this, subject to the Cabinet approval," he said while briefing about the outcome of the consultation meeting of state food ministers on the proposed Food Bill.
Thomas said the Centre has not yet firmed up its views on providing legal right on the quantity of foodgrains, whether 5kg or 7kg per person a month. "These are policy decisions and will be taken after discussion," he said.
The panel has suggested single category classification with uniform entitlement of 5kg per person per month atuni form rate of Rs 2/kg for wheat and Rs 3/kg for rice.
Whereas the Centre has proposed 7kg per person to priority households and 3kg per person at half of the support price to general households.
On the percentage of population to be covered and
subsidised rates of food grains under the Bill, Thomas said, "There was no dispute on these issues at all."
"By and large, coverage under PDS up to 75 per cent of rural population and 50 per cent of urban population, which comes to 67 per cent of total population, is almost acceptable by states," he said.