Coal scam: Government admits giving CIL blocks to private firms
- Raja 'misled' Manmohan Singh on policy matters: CBI to court
- RSS raises Ambedkar vs Mother Teresa row
- From Maldives, road to Islamic State goes via drugs, gangs and jail
- In a first, Indian military contingent to march at Moscow’s Red Square
- Maharashtra by-poll: Shiv Sena set to retain Bandra (E), NCP wins Tasgaon
The Centre Monday admitted before the Supreme Court that it provided certain coal blocks to private companies for captive mining although these blocks fell in areas where the Coal India Ltd (CIL) already had existing leases.
Seeking to justify such allocations, the government, in its affidavit, stated that five such blocks were allocated under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act.
However, it is a well-known fact that these coal blocks were acquired by the government under the Coal Bearing Areas (CBA) Act. Hence, the Centre may find itself in trouble on Tuesday when the court examines its explanation.
A Bench led by Justice R M Lodha had to adjourn the hearing last week after the Attorney General sought some time to explain how certain coal blocks belonging to the lease-hold areas of the CIL were allocated to private companies.
"If these coal blocks identified by CIL and Central Mine Planning and Design Institute Limited (CMPDIL) are part of the lease hold area of CIL, then how can further rights could be created in favour of other companies?" the Bench had asked G E Vahanvati, who requested for some time to file an affidavit on the issue.
In its affidavit, the Coal Ministry has now conceded: "Out of 47 blocks allocated to private parties from 1993 till 2005, five blocks were located in an area where there was a subsisting mining lease or were subject matter of CBA Act notification in favour of CIL subsidiaries."
Further, the government has failed in adducing any information about three out of the five blocks, saying the information was still being sought. On remaining two blocks, it has said in one case, a sub-lease was granted to a private company while in the other, the mining lease was surrendered by the CIL subsidiary and then the private company obtained a mining lease from the state government under the MMDR Act.