Govt admits: Knew about case against CVC Thomas but (still) appointed him
- RBI Governor: From Rao and Singh to Modi, why Urjit Patel was a favourite
- Targeting NSCN(K) camp, Indian Army troops entered Myanmar
- J&K: Infiltration bid along LoC foiled, three militants killed in Kupwara
- Punjab: Gau Raksha Dal chief Satish Kumar arrested
- Turkey: 30 killed, 94 hurt in bomb attack at wedding
The selection committee meeting to choose the central vigilance commissioner in September last year did discuss the Palmolein case against P J Thomas, Home Minister P Chidambaram said on Monday but parried a question whether a "chargesheeted" person should have been appointed.
Addressing a press conference, he was happy to agree with the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj that the committee discussed the issue of a pending case against Thomas before he was named the CVC.
"We did discuss the names of the panel. In fact, the bulk of the time (of discussion) was regarding P J Thomas and the Palmolein case. She (Swaraj) made her points, the other members (the Prime Minister and the Home Minister) of the committee made their points."
"It was brought to the notice of the committee during the discussion that although the case was registered, no sanction of prosecution was granted by the NDA government from December 1999 to May 2004 and by the UPA government subsequently," Chidambaram said.
When the trial of the case was stayed by the Supreme Court between 2007 and 2008, the Central Vigilance Commission had held that no case was made against Thomas and Jiji Thompson, another IAS official. Then Thomas was granted vigilance clearance (for appointment as secretary in the government), he said.
"There could not have been a discussion for several minutes without bringing these facts before the committee. There could not have been a disagreement without a discussion," the Home Minister said.
Citing a statement of the Attorney General that when the apex court had put a specific question whether papers and files relating to the case against Thomas were "circulated" during the meeting on September 3, the AG had said: "I had said the papers and files were not circulated."
"It was never stated (by the AG) that there was no discussion on the case against Thomas," Chidambaram said quoting the Attorney General.
- PM's Balochistan policy: Gameplan, gambit or gamble?
- Lessons to learn from Rio Olympics
- Reminiscing after 70: What were the best decades of independent India?
- Inside Track: No party spirit
- There are systemic flaws and vulnerabilities. But India is on the right path
- Wrestlers lose face, and perhaps an Olympic medal, and NADA its credibility