Govt asks states to review cases of undertrials
- Ghulam Ali's concert in Mumbai cancelled after Shiv Sena's threat
- PM Modi a sensitive person, don't judge him on social media posts: BJP on Dadri lynching
- Why President Mukherjee hit the right notes on core values of 'diversity', 'plurality' and 'tolerance'
- Barack Obama apologises for air strike on Kunduz hospital: White House
- Commercial vehicles entering Delhi to pay environmental tax: NGT
Undertrials lodged in jails for longer duration may soon be released from detention with the Centre directing all states to review such cases saying only the poor continues to be in jails without availing bail.
The Home Ministry told states and union territories that under 436A of CrPC, an undertrial prisoner completing half of the maximum period of imprisonment should be released by the court on his personal bond with or without sureties, with the exception of those involved in heinous crimes.
The advisory said although the percentage overcrowding in jails is steadily going down, even then 67 per cent of the inmates in various prisons are undertrials.
"Invariably it has been found that only the poor and indigent who have not been able to put up the surety are those who have continued to languish as undertrials for very long periods and that too for minor offences.
"The lack of adequate legal aid and a general lack of awareness about rights of arrestees are principal reasons for the continued detention of individuals accused of bailable offences, where bail is a matter of right and where an order of detention is supposed to be an aberration," it said.
The ministry said except those who are charged with offences punishable with the death sentence, no person can be detained in prison as an undertrial for a period exceeding the maximum possible sentence.
Maintaining that a disproportionate amount of prison space and resources are being invested on undertrial prisoners which is not sustainable, the Centre told the states and Uts to constitute a committee in every district with the district judge as chairman, and the district magistrate and district SP as members to meet every three months and review the cases.
Besides, the jail superintendent should conduct a survey of all cases where the undertrial prisoners have completed more than one-fourth of the maximum sentence. He should prepare a survey list and send the same to the District Legal Service Authority (DLSA).