Govt told to reinstate sacked IFS officer
- First directive of CM Adityanath: All ministers to reveal details of assets in 15 days
- What is Idea-Vodafone merger: Here's everything you need to know
- Hate crime in Australia? Indian Catholic priest stabbed with knife by 72-year-old man
- Manipur Chief Minister Biren Singh proves majority, wins floor test
- Need culture of settling disputes amicably outside courts: SC judge
It took eight years of litigation for Mahaveer C Singhvi to prove that his discharge from service as an Indian Foreign Service probationer was done "behind his back" on the basis of an inquiry initiated with the "active interest" of the then foreign minister. A Special Bench of the Supreme Court, in a recent judgment, said the former minister "appears" to have taken an "active interest" in the February 7, 2002 complaint of a woman, who accused Singhvi of making "threatening, abusive and sexually explicit remarks" to her daughter.
The Bench ordered the government to pay Singhvi Rs 25,000 as litigation costs and ordered his reinstatement. Singhvi joined work last week.
"It was the then foreign minister Jaswant Singh who initiated the inquiry against him," Additional Solicitor General P P Malhotra, who argued the case for the government, confirmed to The Indian Express on Thursday. Singh was not available for comment.
The inquiry found "nothing adverse" against Singhvi. Nevertheless, he was issued discharge orders on June 13, 2002 without being given an opportunity to be heard. Though no material record was found against Singhvi suggesting the misconduct complained of, higher-ups in the government remarked that he "would blacken the country's name".
- Hubris has set in. The BJP believes it can get away with anything — it now intends to
- Ban on highway liquor vends is welcome, but why exempt bars?
- No one doubts Irom Sharmila’s heroic resistance to AFSPA. But somewhere, she lost her bearings
- Uttarakhand election had an overarching theme that straddled divides
- A culture that normalises stalking is one that draws artificial lines, discourages dialogue
- The unwritten rule on government formation in hung legislature is quite clear