Gujarat riots: SC says canít monitor trial on daily basis
- Amit Shah moves HC against FIRs on hate speeches
- Defiant Azam Khan stands by Kargil won by Muslim soldiers remark, gets EC notice
- Lok Sabha polls: Voting picks up in NE states; 40 per cent turnout in Manipur till noon
- SC refrains from staying government move to include Jats in OBC category
- Elections 2014 LIVE: It's in Cong's character to make false promises to win elections, says Modi on Shinde's turf
The Supreme Court on Monday observed that it cannot monitor the trial in Gujarat riots cases on a day-to-day basis and that the proper recourse for any aggrieved person would be to approach the High Court.
"For a particular grievance against a trial court order, one should go to the High Court. We cannot, on a day-to-day basis, monitor the trial in the case or monitor every particular regarding implementation of various orders," observed a Bench of Justices D K Jain and Madan B Lokur. The court made these remarks while hearing a petition by Zakia Jafri, wife of slain Congress leader Ehsan Jafri. Zakia has moved the apex court against an order of a trial court, which had refused her plea over supply of certain documents relating to the investigation by the SIT in the Gulberg Society massacre case. Ehsan Jafri was among 69 people killed by a mob in Ahmedabad on February 28, 2002.
The SIT has filed a closure report in the case, giving a clean chit to Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi and other accused of complicity in the case. The trial court in Ahmedabad had on November 27 accepted the closure report filed in March by the SIT. It also closed Zakia's right to file a protest petition against the report.
Appearing for Zakia, senior advocate Kamini Jaiswal contended that her right to file a protest petition was defeated since she had not been supplied all the relevant documents that could have helped build a strong case.
However, members of the SIT present in court claimed that except for a report which was submitted in a sealed cover in the apex court, all other documents had been supplied to her. The Bench asked the SIT to ascertain if all relevant documents, particularly those mentioned in Zakia's petition, had been supplied to her or not and fixed the matter for further hearing after a week.
- Walmart to launch 50 stores in big India push
- Poojary banking on ‘sympathy’ for Dakshina Kannada seat
- Solution to water woes key factor in Chikkaballapur
- Eying 85 pc turnout, election dept offers many sops
- Last day, last show: Parties flex muscles, try to connect with one & all
- From societies to slums, Adhalrao-Patil on the move