HC rejects pleas to halt construction of solid waste management plant
- CBI sought part RTI exemption, Govt gave it full
- Screen Awards: Milkha, Ram-Leela and Madras Cafe dominate
- DGCA seeks fresh public objections after clearing AirAsia for take-off
- Delhi: 51-year-old Danish national alleges gangrape, 15 detained for questioning
- I wonder if I will be able to ever reunite with my husband, my kids. I miss them: Devyani
Ansal Properties, Crossings Infrastructure penalised Rs 10 lakh each; court says Dundahera project is of public importance
The Allahabad High Court on Tuesday rejected a slew of petitions, filed by private developers and other individuals, seeking to stop construction of a solid waste management plant (SWMP) in Dundahera village of Ghaziabad. The court criticised them for delaying the project by five years.
The court also slapped a fine of Rs 10 lakh each on two major petitioners, Ansal Properties Infrastructure Limited and Crossings Infrastructure Private Limited, besides asking them to bear the escalated cost of the project. The fine will have to be deposited by the petitioners to the Ghaziabad Municipal Corporation (GMC).
The court held that the project was of public importance and the petitioners had been misleading it by filing frivolous petitions.
The court also cancelled the notification for acquisition of 34 acres of land in Dundahera (within which the 14 acres for the SWMP was also shown as included) on the grounds that it was done at the behest of private developers in connivance with the Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) to change the land use of the village in the Master Plan of Ghaziabad-2021.
The SWMP was proposed to be constructed as part of a central government policy, subsequent to a Supreme Court order of 1996, in which it was said that all cities having air bases should have better disposal of garbage to avoid problems of careless disposal of garbage, which leads to bird hits.
The site in Dundahera was to cater to the Hindon airbase and other surrounding areas in scientifically disposing of garbage and work had begun in 2005.
The petitioners, who had been allotted land by the GDA for constructing integrated townships, had tried to convince the court that the plot of 14 acres, where the proposed SWMP was supposed to be constructed, was marked for "residential" purposes and not for SWMP. The court rejected their contention after going through the facts and records placed before it.