HC seeks Centre's reply on Sadhvi Pragya's plea regarding NIA
- Rahul on leave before budget session, BJP says people have already sent Cong on long leave
- 21 more deaths due to swine flu, toll reaches 833
- Anna protests against Land Acquisition Bill in Delhi, lashes out at Modi govt
- Budget: Finance Minister may announce policy plans to combat blackmoney
- Land Acquisition Act "suitably refined": President Pranab Mukherjee
The Bombay High Court today sought the reply of the Union government on a petition filed by Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, challenging the constitutional validity of the National Investigation Agency (NIA).
In her petition, Sadhvi has sought the court to quash an order passed in April last year transferring investigations into the blast case to the NIA by the Union government.
According to her plea, the central government cannot transfer investigations of a case without concurrence from the state government.
A division bench of Justices A S Oka and S S Shinde, however, said the petitioner will have to satisfy the court on whether an accused has the right under law to challenge transfer of investigations. "What is the locus of the accused?" the court said.
The bench has directed the Union government to file its reply by February 4, 2013.
"NIA does not have retrospective power to re-investigate into those offences where charge sheet has been already filed by state investigating agencies," Sadhvi has said in her petition adding the agency has a political agenda.
Sadhvi and more than ten others, members of right wing organisation Abhinav Bharat, were arrested for their alleged involvement in the September 2008 Malegaon blast case.