HC seeks report on CDRs submitted to trial court
- Arvind Kejriwal to launch AAP's Lok Sabha poll campaign from Haryana today
- Donât discriminate between Muslims and others on false cases: Purohit to Shinde
- Fraud Office gets govt nod to prosecute Radia firms
- âStingâ journalist who reported on Amit Shah gets VIP security
- Army said unit was headed for IAF drill, ex-Air Chief says this was due only a month later
7/11 blasts case Court says it feels govt may be hiding records
The Bombay High Court on Thursday sought a confidential report from the special Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) court, trying 13 alleged SIMI members in the 7/11 train blasts cases, asking for the number of volumes of the Call Data Records (CDRs) that were submitted to the trial court.
"I have to remove doubt on whether the documents are there and you (state government) are trying to hide it," Justice A M Thipsay said. He added that "coercive action" will have to be taken if it was found that the state had hidden the CDRs. The court felt that the CDRs are kept somewhere but the state government may be hiding them.
The accused had moved the High Court in September, challenging the order of a special MCOCA court that rejected their plea seeking the examination of three police officers who recorded the confessions of three accused in the cases related to Indian Mujahideen (IM), which claimed responsibility for all major blasts in the country since 2005. The 7/11 accused had also sought the CDRs that the prosecution had relied on to prove their links to the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT).
After perusing the case diary in the 7/11 case, the court noted that the performa of the documents submitted by the then investigating officer had indicated the case papers would be divided into 10 volumes. The case diary, the court noted, contained the CDRs, correspondences and printouts of small details that were available to the Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS). They were directed to be kept in volumes 4 and 6.
Prosecution lawyers Revati Dere and Usha Kejriwal, however, said it was an internal correspondence which was later revised to just four volumes for the sake of convenience.
- ‘Irrespective of the noise, BJP won’t get so many seats. There is craze for Modi, but how much translates into votes is difficult to say’
- Hindus should 'produce' at least 5 children, says VHP leader Ashok Singhal
- AMU teachers body to boycott Mulayam visit
- Mulayam, Akhilesh woo Brahmins, Muslims
- ‘Sting’ journalist who reported on Amit Shah gets VIP security
- Don’t discriminate between Muslims and others on false cases: Purohit writes to Shinde
- Top General speaks: Def Secy summoned me late night, said highest seat of power was worried, troops must go back quickly
- Government blames BJP for delay in passage of Telangana bill in Rajya Sabha, may extend Parliament session
- Dhoni, do you believe you can win abroad? | The Indian Express
- ‘Troop movement should’ve been avoided if they knew (V K Singh’s) court date’